26

(127 replies, posted in Matches)

Well even though it was an out of season understrength team I had hoped we would not be decisively outplayed by the university team and that Machan,Wernars etc might look more the part.The batting was very uninspiring. In fact Sussex,Canada and Netherlands are just the whipping boys here. I think WICB will have to reconsider whether these invitations serve any useful purpose for West Indies cricket.
Looks now like an early return so I will only get to see Sussex play one game in Barbados

27

(127 replies, posted in Matches)

Practice or not trhe Sussex batting has so far been quite woeful with a number of players (Yardy,Wernars,Hodd,Machan) really looking quite unable to score at any reasonable rate. you would have hoped they could have performed a little better against the University team

28

(127 replies, posted in Matches)

Sweatysock wrote:

awful from the skipper there - game virtually over now

is that his second golden duck?

29

(127 replies, posted in Matches)

Another reverse sweep ...same result

Five down and nearing the end

30

(127 replies, posted in Matches)

Does Gatting need to use the premeditated reverse sweep? With three down I struggle to see where we will get the runs against the University spinners.

31

(127 replies, posted in Matches)

Machan bowled and put out of his misery...CCC on top now

32

(127 replies, posted in Matches)

Poor Matt Machan can hardly get it off the Square ,but Gatts is giving it a go

33

(127 replies, posted in Matches)

Wicket maiden...pretty safe to book an early flight back I think.

34

(127 replies, posted in Matches)

Its a sloppy performance in the field and CCC are getting a respectable total on another low and slow wicket

35

(127 replies, posted in Matches)

The Sussex catching has been below standard

36

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

CCC is not a push over at all  ...

37

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

Not our finest hour...and a big negative run rate.

will require two wins to go through

38

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

Ben cant get bat on ball let alone score at ten an over...we wont make 130

Edit we wont get close to 130...well beaten already

39

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

Nash Gawn and I dont think we have the firepower for this chase

40

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

Sussex have been poor in the field and that was a poor run out...not even close

T20 doesnt provide a margin for such errors

41

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

Tram Man wrote:

Target 153

we're doomed

sad  sad


Certainly are

42

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

The Paperboy wrote:

TC, any chance of sticking your laptop in front of the TV and turning on Skype for the Sussex innings?

big_smile

43

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

looks like curtains here

44

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

Another SIX

they will get more than 140

45

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

Another bad drop

46

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

Nash on SIX

47

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

we may be chasing 25 more than we made against Neth against better bowling..the diff is probably the drops

48

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

Why is Gatting bowling cr@p


never seen anything this bad even in club cricket...long hops wides sixes..

AND a wICKET

49

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

need some wickets now....


84-3 off 14

50

(138 replies, posted in Matches)

Hodd drops an esasy sitter

those two catches could be costly...neither was hard and Hodds was easy